Re: [PATCH] gc: support temporarily preserving garbage
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:03:12
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:04:29AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
If it is a problem (and again, I am just guessing), I'd imagine you would need a similar setup to what you proposed for unlink(): before renaming "packed-refs.lock" into "packed-refs", hard-link it into your "trash" area. And you'd probably want to intercept rename() there, to catch all places where we use this technique.Also we need to take it into account that it is not an issue unique to Git that the server side may expire these .nfsXXXXX entries left by an NFS client ("silly rename") to keep files that have been removed or renamed away alive. Aren't there a knob on the NFS server end to control how long these are kept unexpired to avoid stale filehandle errors, so that not just Git but all applications running on NFS client machines will not be hurt by it? Working it around at the application program level for each and every application that runs on a machine that can NFS mount filesystems from elsewhere may be simply madness, no?
Thanks. That is the vague feeling I have about the series, but without having actually _seen_ the problem or knowing to what extent it affects git, I didn't want to say anything so definite (e.g., I am only guessing that rename() is a problem, but from the original description, it sounds quite plausible that it is). If this can be fixed outside of git, I very much agree that is the best path forward. -Peff