Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] gc: support temporarily preserving garbage

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:03:12

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:04:29AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
If it is a problem (and again, I am just guessing), I'd imagine you
would need a similar setup to what you proposed for unlink(): before
renaming "packed-refs.lock" into "packed-refs", hard-link it into your
"trash" area. And you'd probably want to intercept rename() there, to
catch all places where we use this technique.
Also we need to take it into account that it is not an issue unique
to Git that the server side may expire these .nfsXXXXX entries left
by an NFS client ("silly rename") to keep files that have been
removed or renamed away alive.  Aren't there a knob on the NFS
server end to control how long these are kept unexpired to avoid
stale filehandle errors, so that not just Git but all applications
running on NFS client machines will not be hurt by it?

Working it around at the application program level for each and
every application that runs on a machine that can NFS mount
filesystems from elsewhere may be simply madness, no?
Thanks. That is the vague feeling I have about the series, but without
having actually _seen_ the problem or knowing to what extent it affects
git, I didn't want to say anything so definite (e.g., I am only guessing
that rename() is a problem, but from the original description, it sounds
quite plausible that it is).

If this can be fixed outside of git, I very much agree that is the best
path forward.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help