Re: [PATCH] t/lib-gpg: adjust permissions for gnupg 2.1

Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:

Orthogonal to that is the pinentry issue: I haven't checked whether
gpg2.1 asking for passphrases on passphrase-less secure keys is to be
fixed on the gpg side. If yes, I would just wait for that since gpg2.1
is not common yet.

If not, we should provide (in gpg config) an alternative pinentry that
just returns an empty passphrase without bugging the user.

Sounds like a sensible plan to me.  Thanks.