Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
+static const char *update_worktree(unsigned char *sha1)
+{
+...
+ const char *work_tree = git_work_tree_cfg ? git_work_tree_cfg : "..";
I overlooked this one, but is there a reason why this has to look at
an internal implementatino detail which is git_work_tree_cfg,
instead of asking get_git_work_tree()?
I am wondering if that reason is a valid rationale to fix whatever
makes get_git_work_tree() unsuitable for this purpose.
Cc'ing Duy who has been working on the part of the system to
determine and set-up work-tree and git-dir.