Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 0/2] git-am: add --message-id/--no-message-id options

From: Paolo Bonzini <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:03:06


On 25/11/2014 19:33, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
quoted
If both --message-id and -s are specified, the Signed-off-by goes
last.  This is coming out more or less naturally out of the git-am
implementation, but is also tested in t4150-am.sh.
Nice.  So if you apply a message whose last sign-off is yourself
with both of these options, what would we see?

    1. S-o-b: you and then M-id: and then another S-o-b: you?
    2. M-id: and then S-o-b: you?
    3. S-o-b: you and then M-id:?

I do not offhand know which one of the above possibilities to favor
more over others myself.  Just asking to find out more about the
thinking behind the design.
You currently get (1), which is arguably the most precise but definitely
the ugliest.

In this case (posting as maintainer), I would probably not use "git am
--message-id"; instead I would use an alias to add the Message-Id (with
git interpret-trailers!) after posting to the mailing list, resulting in
either (2) or (3).

I think (but I am not sure) that git-am could use a hook to rewrite (1)
into (2) or (3).

Paolo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help