Re: [PATCH] Initialise hash variable to prevent compiler warnings
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:02:42
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Felipe Franciosi [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
FNV/I/IDIV10/0 covers all the possibilities of (method & 3), I would have to say that the compiler needs to be fixed. Or insert "default:" just before "case HASH_METHOD_0:" line? I dunno.Hmm... The "default:" would work, but is it really that bad to initialise a local variable in this case? In any case, the compilation warning is annoying. Do you prefer the default or the initialisation?
If I really had to choose between the two, adding a useless initialization would be the less harmful choice. Adding a meaningless "default:" robs another chance from the compilers to diagnose a future breakage we might add (namely, we may extend methods and forget to write a corresponding case arm for the new method value, which a smart compiler can and do diagnose as a switch that does not handle all the possible values. Thanks.