Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] test-lib.sh: support -x option for shell-tracing

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:02:42
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 03:22:50PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Rerolled patch is below. Sorry for all the emails. I'll stop looking at
it now to give you guys a chance to find any remaining mistakes. ;)
Does 1308 pass with this patch for you (running it without "-x")?
Hmph. It does not. I know that "make test" passed with an earlier
iteration, but I must have gotten so wrapped up in testing "make
GIT_TEST_OPTS=-x test" that I never ran a vanilla "make test" on
what I finally posted. Sorry.
The original that expects a hardcoded line number (not relative to
the original or something) is a bad taste, and also the test setup
procedure is broken (see below for a fix of that breakage, which
does not fix the breakage this patch seems to bring in anyway).
Yeah, I agree, and your patch below looks reasonable.
But still it is disturbing to see that there is a blank line
difference with and without this change in the file created by the
test (i.e. the client of the code this patch touches).
This fixes it:
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index 4dab575..059bb25 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -528,8 +528,7 @@ maybe_setup_valgrind () {
 test_eval_inner_ () {
 	eval "
 		test \"$trace\" = t && set -x
-		$*
-	"
+		$*"
 }
 
 test_eval_ () {

My patch definitely expands the snippet with an extra trailing newline.
But what I really don't understand is why that would impact the
_contents_ of the config file.

I'll dig further, but I'm about to leave the computer for dinner for a
few hours, so please don't hold your breath. :)

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help