RE: Performance Issues with Git Rebase
From: Crabtree, Andrew <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:02:42
Ah gotcha. That makes sense. Default behavior is to do a patch-id check on all of them which is exactly what you would normally want to happen, and suppressing that speeds things up considerably at the risk of attempting to re-apply an already existing patch. Thanks much for the explanation. Perhaps I'll add a progress indicator since my organization will be doing a significant number of these types of rebases in the near future. Regards, -Andrew
-----Original Message----- From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gitster@pobox.com] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 10:26 AM To: Crabtree, Andrew Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Performance Issues with Git Rebase "Crabtree, Andrew" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
I'm getting the same output with both the triple and double dot for my specific case, but I have no idea if that change makes sense for all cases or not. Any guidance?The difference only matters if any of your 4 patches have been sent to your upstream and accepted and appear among the 4665 changes they have. The --cherry-pick option is about cross checking the combinations of 4 x 4665 and filter out matching ones (if any).