Re: [PATCH/RFC 5/5] add tests for checking the behaviour of "unset.variable"
From: Matthieu Moy <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:02:38
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
The "git config [--add] section.var value" UI, [...] finds the "var = value" definition at the end (or adds a "section" at the end and then adds [...] It is fine for single-valued ones that follow "the last one wins" semantics; "git config" would add the new definition at the end and that definition will win.
Not always. git config foo.bar old-value git config unset.variable foo.bar git config foo.bar new-value One could expect the new value to be taken into account, but it is not.
quoted
Well, the normal use-case for unset.variable is to put it in a local config file, to unset a variable set in another, lower-priority file.I agree that is one major use case.quoted
This common use-case works with the command-line "git config", and it would be a pity to forbid the common use-case because of a particular, unusual case.Either you are being incoherent or I am not reading you right. If you said "If this common use-case worked with the command-line 'git config', it would be nice, but it would be a pity because it does not", I would understand.
I think you missed the "another" in my sentence above. The normal use-case is to have foo.bar and unset.variable=foo.bar in different files. In this case, you do not care about the position in file.
in a repository whose .git/config does not have any unset.variable, you will add that _at the end_, which would undo what you did in your configuration file, not just what came before yours. Even if you ignore more exotic cases, the command line is *not* working.
If my sysadmin has set foo.bar=boz in /etc/gitconfig, I can use git config [--global] unset.variable foo.bar and it does work. Always. Playing with the order of variables in-file is essentially useless OTOH except for the include case you mentionned (if I want to unset a variable in a file, I'll just delete or comment out the variable and I don't need unset.variable). Really, I don't see the point in making any complex plans to support the useless part of the unset.variable feature. The reason it was designed for already works, and $EDITOR does the job for other cases. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/