Re: [PATCH/RFC 5/5] add tests for checking the behaviour of "unset.variable"

From
Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date
2016-06-15 23:02:38
Tanay Abhra [off-list ref] writes:
On 10/3/2014 1:39 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Tanay Abhra [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
+test_expect_success 'document how unset.variable will behave in shell scripts' '
+	rm -f .git/config &&
+	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+	EOF
+	git config foo.bar boz1 &&
+	git config --add foo.bar boz2 &&
+	git config unset.variable foo.bar &&
+	git config --add foo.bar boz3 &&
+	test_must_fail git config --get-all foo.bar >actual &&
You make foo.bar a multi-valued one, then you unset it, so I would
imagine that the value given after that, 'boz3', would be the only
value foo.bar has.  Why should --get-all fail?

I am having a hard time imagining how this behaviour can make any
sense.
git config -add appends the value to a existing header, after these
two commands have executed the config file would look like,
...
I *know* how it is implemented before the changes of this series.
And if the original implementation of "add" is left as-is, I can
imagine how such a behaviour that is unintuitive to end-users can
arise.

I was and am having a hard time how this behaviour can make any
sense from an end-user's point of view.
Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help