Re: Can I fetch an arbitrary commit by sha1?
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:02:38
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:22:50AM -0400, Dan Johnson wrote:
quoted
quoted
git show af00f4c39bcc8dc29ed8f59a47066d5993c279e4fatal: bad object af00f4c39bcc8dc29ed8f59a47066d5993c279e4quoted
git fetch origin af00f4c39bcc8dc29ed8f59a47066d5993c279e4error: no such remote ref af00f4c39bcc8dc29ed8f59a47066d5993c279e4quoted
git fetch origin refs/foo/b1remote: Counting objects: 3, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done. remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done. From https://github.com/chalstrick/dondalfi * branch refs/foo/b1 -> FETCH_HEADquoted
git fetch origin af00f4c39bcc8dc29ed8f59a47066d5993c279e4From https://github.com/chalstrick/dondalfi * branch af00f4c39bcc8dc29ed8f59a47066d5993c279e4 -> FETCH_HEADMy understanding is that you are allowed to ask for a SHA1, but most git servers refuse the request. But if you already have the SHA locally, then git doesn't neet to bother asking the server for it, so there's no request to be refused.
That's right. It is the server which enforces the "you cannot fetch an arbitrary sha1" rule. But I think Christian is arguing that the client side should complain that $sha1 is not a remote ref, and therefore not something we can fetch. This used to be the behavior until 6e7b66e (fetch: fetch objects by their exact SHA-1 object names, 2013-01-29). The idea there is that some refs may be kept "hidden" from the ref advertisement, but clients who learn about the sha1 out-of-band may fetch the tips of hidden refs. I'm not sure it is a feature that has been particularly well-used to date, though. -Peff