Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-rebase.txt: make it explicit in the syntax there is no way to specify <branch> without <upstream>.
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:02:32
Sergey Organov [off-list ref] writes:
Current syntax description makes one wonder if there is any syntactic way to distinguish between <branch> and <upstream> so that one can specify <branch> but not <upstream>. The change makes it explicit that these arguments are in fact positional.
Makes sense. Thanks.
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <redacted> --- Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt index f14100a..4138554 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ SYNOPSIS -------- [verse] 'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [options] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>] - [<upstream>] [<branch>] + [<upstream> [<branch>]] 'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [options] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>] --root [<branch>] 'git rebase' --continue | --skip | --abort | --edit-todo