Re: [PATCH 2/2] pretty: add %D format specifier

Harry Jeffery [off-list ref] writes:

On 11/09/14 17:56, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Because patch 1/2 alone does not make much sense without 2/2, it
probably would have been better to do these as a single patch.

Would you like me to resubmit it as a single patch, or are you
applying them as is?

quoted

And of course a few additional tests to t4205 would not hurt ;-)

Sure. Should the tests be in the same patch, or a subsequent one?

All in one; that way, "git show $that_single_patch" later can become
more useful by demonstrating expected uses in its test.