Re: [PATCH 3/4] Added tests for the case of merged and unmerged entries for the same file
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:02:19
Jaime Soriano Pastor [off-list ref] writes:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Jaime Soriano Pastor [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Signed-off-by: Jaime Soriano Pastor <redacted> --- t/t9904-unmerged-file-with-merged-entry.sh | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Isn't this number already used for another test? A test on the index probably belongs to t2XXX or t3XXX family.Umm, I though this test number was free, I just added it to the last+1 position, if I finally add a test I'll take this into account. Thanks.
Please check t/README for classes of features and appropriate first digit; also do not forget that there are topics by other people in flight and you may need to at least check with the tip of the 'pu' branch. Thanks.
quoted
quoted
1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100755 t/t9904-unmerged-file-with-merged-entry.shdiff --git a/t/t9904-unmerged-file-with-merged-entry.sh b/t/t9904-unmerged-file-with-merged-entry.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..945bc1c --- /dev/null +++ b/t/t9904-unmerged-file-with-merged-entry.sh@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Operations with unmerged files with merged entries' + +. ./test-lib.sh + +setup_repository() { +... +}No error is checked here?This is only a helper function for setup, not a test itself.
So what? If the set-up fails, we would want
$ sh tXXXX-my-test.sh -i
to immediately stop without going further.