On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:35:50PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
quoted
It's probably not a big deal, as we don't expect random
junk in the pack directory, but I wonder if it would be better to be
explicit, like:
<snip>
Here's a simpler approach:
I agree that solves the problem. However, I'm about to post an
alternative series that also replaces has_extension with strip_suffix,
which I think ends up a bit nicer.
-Peff