Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCHv4 4/4] t7510: test verify-commit

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:01:45

Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:
 	sed -e "s/seventh/7th forged/" raw >forged1 &&
 	git hash-object -w -t commit forged1 >forged1.commit &&
+	! git verify-commit $(cat forged1.commit) &&
test_must_fail git verify-commit ... &&
quoted hunk
 	git show --pretty=short --show-signature $(cat forged1.commit) >actual1 &&
 	grep "BAD signature from" actual1 &&
 	! grep "Good signature from" actual1
@@ -94,6 +110,7 @@ test_expect_success GPG 'detect fudged signature with NUL' '
 	cat raw >forged2 &&
 	echo Qwik | tr "Q" "\000" >>forged2 &&
 	git hash-object -w -t commit forged2 >forged2.commit &&
+	! git verify-commit $(cat forged2.commit) &&
test_must_fail git verify-commit ... &&
quoted hunk
 	git show --pretty=short --show-signature $(cat forged2.commit) >actual2 &&
 	grep "BAD signature from" actual2 &&
 	! grep "Good signature from" actual2
@@ -102,6 +119,7 @@ test_expect_success GPG 'detect fudged signature with NUL' '
 test_expect_success GPG 'amending already signed commit' '
 	git checkout fourth-signed^0 &&
 	git commit --amend -S --no-edit &&
+	git verify-commit HEAD &&
 	git show -s --show-signature HEAD >actual &&
 	grep "Good signature from" actual &&
 	! grep "BAD signature from" actual
Most of the tests, unlike "git show --show-signature" tests, do not
seem to check the output from the command.  Is it because its
primary interface to scripts is its exit status [*1*]?

[Footnote]

*1* "Yes" is totally an acceptable answer and a justification for
not checking the output in many of these tests.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help