Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] config: add hashtable for config parsing & retrieval
flat view
From: Ramsay Jones <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:01:44
On 23/06/14 17:20, Tanay Abhra wrote:
On 06/23/2014 07:57 AM, Ramsay Jones wrote:quoted
On 23/06/14 11:11, Tanay Abhra wrote:
[snip]
quoted
quoted
+static struct hashmap *get_config_cache(void) +{ + static struct hashmap config_cache; + if (!hashmap_initialized) { + config_cache_init(&config_cache); + hashmap_initialized = 1; + git_config(config_cache_callback, NULL); + } + return &config_cache; +}[I have not been following this series at all (sorry I haven't had the time to spare), so take these comments with a very big pinch of salt! ie just ignore me if it's already been discussed etc. ;-) ] The 'git config' command can be used to read arbitrary files (so long as they conform to the config syntax). For example, see the --file and --blob options to git-config. At present, I think only scripted commands use this facility (eg git-submodule). Noting the singleton config_cache, what happens when git-submodule becomes a C builtin, or indeed any other C builtin wants to take advantage of the new code when processing a non- standard config file?This series was mainly to replace git_config() invocations around the codebase. There are currently 111 git_config() invocations, each of which causes a file reread whenever called. git_config() only feeds values from the standard config files(i.e repo, user and global config). For reading config values from specific files or blobs, there are three functions git_config_with_options, git_config_from_file & git_config_from_blob which can be easily used inside a C builtin or anywhere in the code. The bulk of git_config_api calls are only for git_config(). For example, git_config_from_file() has three hits only in entire codebase, git_config_with_options() has 5 hits, so I concentrated on generating a cache for the usual config files only. For other files, the callers can fall back on older API functions like I had mentioned above. Forgive me if I inferred your question incorrectly. More below.
Hmm, maybe. The "... take advantage of the new code" refers to the possibility (or otherwise) of re-using your work to update these "older API" functions to the new API style. (also, see Junio's response). [In order to do this, I would have expected to see one hash table for each file/blob, so the singleton object took me by surprise.] An "out of scope for this project" is a perfectly acceptable response (*particularly* since it is very late in the day to be bringing this up!).
quoted
quoted
+static struct config_cache_entry *config_cache_find_entry(const char *key) +{ + struct hashmap *config_cache; + struct config_cache_entry k; + struct config_cache_entry *found_entry; + char *normalized_key; + int ret; + config_cache = get_config_cache(); + ret = git_config_parse_key(key, &normalized_key, NULL); + + if (ret) + return NULL; + + hashmap_entry_init(&k, strhash(normalized_key)); + k.key = normalized_key; + found_entry = hashmap_get(config_cache, &k, NULL); + free(normalized_key); + return found_entry; +} + +static struct string_list *config_cache_get_value(const char *key) +{ + struct config_cache_entry *e = config_cache_find_entry(key); + return e ? &e->value_list : NULL; +} + +static int config_cache_add_value(const char *key, const char *value) +{ + struct hashmap *config_cache; + struct config_cache_entry *e; + struct string_list_item *item; + int *boolean_null_flag; + + config_cache = get_config_cache(); + e = config_cache_find_entry(key); + + boolean_null_flag = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*boolean_null_flag)); + + if (!e) { + e = xmalloc(sizeof(*e)); + hashmap_entry_init(e, strhash(key)); + e->key = xstrdup(key);config_cache_find_entry() searches for (and hashes the) normalized_key. Should you not be entering the normalized key here?config_cache_add_value() is fed key-values pairs through the git_config() callback mechanism, which normalises the key beforehand, so no need for renormalising.
Ah, yes, I forgot that the parsing code does a tolower() at various places while accumulating the key string. So the (potentially) non- normalized keys come from the user via the new API functions and, rather than putting code to normalize the key in each of those, just do it once in config_cache_find_entry(). (Although, you could possibly do that in config_cache_get_value()). OK. Hmm, maybe add a short comment to that effect? dunno. ATB, Ramsay Jones