Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] config: add hashtable for config parsing & retrieval

flat view

From: Ramsay Jones <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:01:44

On 23/06/14 17:20, Tanay Abhra wrote:
On 06/23/2014 07:57 AM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
quoted
On 23/06/14 11:11, Tanay Abhra wrote:
[snip]
quoted
quoted
+static struct hashmap *get_config_cache(void)
+{
+	static struct hashmap config_cache;
+	if (!hashmap_initialized) {
+		config_cache_init(&config_cache);
+		hashmap_initialized = 1;
+		git_config(config_cache_callback, NULL);
+	}
+	return &config_cache;
+}
[I have not been following this series at all (sorry I haven't had
the time to spare), so take these comments with a very big pinch of
salt! ie just ignore me if it's already been discussed etc. ;-) ]

The 'git config' command can be used to read arbitrary files (so long
as they conform to the config syntax). For example, see the --file and
--blob options to git-config. At present, I think only scripted commands
use this facility (eg git-submodule). Noting the singleton config_cache,
what happens when git-submodule becomes a C builtin, or indeed any other
C builtin wants to take advantage of the new code when processing a non-
standard config file?
This series was mainly to replace git_config() invocations around the codebase.
There are currently 111 git_config() invocations, each of which causes a file
reread whenever called. git_config() only feeds values from the standard config
files(i.e repo, user and global config).

For reading config values from specific files or blobs, there are three functions
git_config_with_options, git_config_from_file & git_config_from_blob which can be
easily used inside a C builtin or anywhere in the code.

The bulk of git_config_api calls are only for git_config(). For example,
git_config_from_file() has three hits only in entire codebase,
git_config_with_options() has 5 hits, so I concentrated on generating a cache
for the usual config files only. For other files, the callers can fall back on older
API functions like I had mentioned above.

Forgive me if I inferred your question incorrectly. More below.
Hmm, maybe. The "... take advantage of the new code" refers to the
possibility (or otherwise) of re-using your work to update these
"older API" functions to the new API style. (also, see Junio's response).
[In order to do this, I would have expected to see one hash table
for each file/blob, so the singleton object took me by surprise.]

An "out of scope for this project" is a perfectly acceptable
response (*particularly* since it is very late in the day to be
bringing this up!).
quoted
quoted
+static struct config_cache_entry *config_cache_find_entry(const char *key)
+{
+	struct hashmap *config_cache;
+	struct config_cache_entry k;
+	struct config_cache_entry *found_entry;
+	char *normalized_key;
+	int ret;
+	config_cache = get_config_cache();
+	ret = git_config_parse_key(key, &normalized_key, NULL);
+
+	if (ret)
+		return NULL;
+
+	hashmap_entry_init(&k, strhash(normalized_key));
+	k.key = normalized_key;
+	found_entry = hashmap_get(config_cache, &k, NULL);
+	free(normalized_key);
+	return found_entry;
+}
+
+static struct string_list *config_cache_get_value(const char *key)
+{
+	struct config_cache_entry *e = config_cache_find_entry(key);
+	return e ? &e->value_list : NULL;
+}
+
+static int config_cache_add_value(const char *key, const char *value)
+{
+	struct hashmap *config_cache;
+	struct config_cache_entry *e;
+	struct string_list_item *item;
+	int *boolean_null_flag;
+
+	config_cache = get_config_cache();
+	e = config_cache_find_entry(key);
+
+	boolean_null_flag = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*boolean_null_flag));
+
+	if (!e) {
+		e = xmalloc(sizeof(*e));
+		hashmap_entry_init(e, strhash(key));
+		e->key = xstrdup(key);
config_cache_find_entry() searches for (and hashes the) normalized_key.
Should you not be entering the normalized key here?
config_cache_add_value() is fed key-values pairs through the git_config()
callback mechanism, which normalises the key beforehand, so no need for
renormalising.
Ah, yes, I forgot that the parsing code does a tolower() at various
places while accumulating the key string. So the (potentially) non-
normalized keys come from the user via the new API functions and,
rather than putting code to normalize the key in each of those,
just do it once in config_cache_find_entry(). (Although, you could
possibly do that in config_cache_get_value()).  OK.

Hmm, maybe add a short comment to that effect? dunno.

ATB,
Ramsay Jones
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help