Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] verify-commit: verify commit signatures

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:01:44

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:52:38AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
The one thing that does give me pause is that we do not seem to have any
way of accessing mergetag signatures. We should perhaps stop and think
for a second about how we might expose those (and whether it would fit
into the "git-verify-{commit,tag}" paradigm). I am tempted to say that
"git verify-tag" on a commit should verify the mergetag (right now it
would simply be an error). But I haven't though that hard on it.
I agree that "verify-commit" that lives next to "verify-tag" is fine
and does not have to wait for a unified "verify" that may not even
be a good idea, but if we were to verify the mergetags in one of
these "verify-$OBJECTTYPE" commands, I would think "verify-commit"
should be the one to check them, for the simple reason that they
appear in "commit" objects, not in "tag" objects.
My thinking was the opposite: it is a signature on a tag, but that
signature happens to be stuffed into a commit object. But I do not have
a strong feeling either way.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help