Re: [PATCH 01/15] builtin/add.c: rearrange xcalloc arguments
From: Eric Sunshine <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:01:24
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Brian Gesiak [off-list ref] wrote:
Oomph, how embarrassing. Thanks for pointing that out!
Etiquette on this list is to avoid top-posting [1]. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/11/111
Would it be better if I rerolled the patches?
Junio may or may not make small fixes himself when he picks up a patch series. If you don't hear from him and your patches don't appear in his 'pu' branch with that fix, re-rolling might be advisable.
- Brian Gesiak On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Eric Sunshine [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Brian Gesiak [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
xcalloc takes two arguments: the number of elements and their size. run_add_interactive passes the arguments in reverse order, passing the size of a char*, followed by the number of char* to be allocated. Rearrgange them so they are in the correct order.
If you do re-roll, perhaps consider simplifying the commit messages.
The patch itself states concisely and precisely what is being changed;
the lengthy prose description doesn't really add anything (and makes
more work for you and the reader of the message). It might be
sufficient to use a single-line (Subject:) commit message, like this:
builtin/add.c: fix order of xcalloc arguments
quoted
s/Rearrgange/Rearrange/ Same misspelling afflicts the entire patch series.quoted
Signed-off-by: Brian Gesiak <redacted> --- builtin/add.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/builtin/add.c b/builtin/add.c index 672adc0..488acf4 100644 --- a/builtin/add.c +++ b/builtin/add.c@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ int run_add_interactive(const char *revision, const char *patch_mode, int status, ac, i; const char **args; - args = xcalloc(sizeof(const char *), (pathspec->nr + 6)); + args = xcalloc((pathspec->nr + 6), sizeof(const char *)); ac = 0; args[ac++] = "add--interactive"; if (patch_mode) --2.0.0.rc1.543.gc8042da