Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Remove 'git archimport'

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Felipe Contreras
[off-list ref] wrote:

No updates since 2010, and no tests.

NAK.

IMHO, this is quite unfriendly.

Is this removal based on your opinion, or Junio's position (or
consensus from maintainers from the list)? If there is a clear
consensus or direction for old code such as this, please let me know
(but copy martin.langhoff@gmail.com, not just my very old address!).

Plus, foreign SCM tools should live out-of-tree anyway.

Says who? Is there consensus on this?

It's generally the privilege of the maintainer -- in this case Junio
or perhaps Linus -- to take harsh stances like this.

Junio, what's your position?



m
-- 
 martin@laptop.org
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff