Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] contrib/subtree/Makefile: Standardisation pass
From: James Denholm <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:01:01
On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
[fixed David's address in cc list]
Ah, right. Wasn't sure what was going on there.
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:54:30AM +1000, James Denholm wrote:quoted
Given that subtree subtree doesn't really generate a lot of discussion, would it be advisable to wrap this up (barring further discussion) and send it off to Junio rather than waiting for further community consensus?I do not know if "lack of discussion" is a good reason to consider something in good shape; oftentimes it is a sign that nobody is interested in the area. We usually rely on "area maintainers" to give an OK to the patches if they are not something that the maintainer himself has an interest in.
Yeah, I certainly only meant that in the context of this particular patch, post-review.
However, in this case, you did get review, and I think it is pretty easy to see the patches are good even if one does not care about the particular area. So I think they are fine to pass on and apply.
Sounds good, I'll send it on up now. Thanks again for the help.
Note also that patches like this are a great place to get started, as they help build trust in a contributor, who can later help out with area maintenance.
Yeah, to be honest, beyond the immediate goal of getting subtree in more distros, that is kinda the plan. A bit of a practical experience in contributing to the project, learning the specific ropes and such before proposing more substantial discussion and fixes/changes. --- Regards, James Denholm.