On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Geert Bosch [off-list ref] wrote:
On Apr 28, 2014, at 02:29, Marat Radchenko [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
In short:
1. Hack, hack, hack
2. Commit
3. Push, woops, reject (non-ff)
4. Pull
5. Push
Just do pull --rebase? This is essentially the same as what SVN
used to do in your setup.
That's not necessarily a good solution either. For teams that don't
use rebase, it can leave them with their newly committed stuff now
rebased on the work from upstream--duplicating commits without
understanding why and where they came from, especially if other
branches were built on top of that one.
I agree in concept, but in practice it can be quite confusing. :-(
-John