Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] pull: add --merge option

From: brian m. carlson <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:00:58

On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:41:34PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
brian m. carlson wrote:
quoted
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 07:00:05PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
quoted
Also, deprecate --no-rebase since there's no need for it any more.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <redacted>
---
 Documentation/git-pull.txt |  8 ++++++--
 git-pull.sh                | 10 +++++++++-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-pull.txt b/Documentation/git-pull.txt
index 9a91b9f..767bca3 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-pull.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-pull.txt
@@ -127,8 +127,12 @@ It rewrites history, which does not bode well when you
 published that history already.  Do *not* use this option
 unless you have read linkgit:git-rebase[1] carefully.
 
---no-rebase::
-	Override earlier --rebase.
+-m::
+--merge::
+	Force a merge.
++
+See `pull.mode`, `branch.<name>.pullmode` in linkgit:git-config[1] if you want
+to make `git pull` always use `--merge`.
So I'm confused here, and maybe you can enlighten me.  As I read this
documentation, --merge would always force a merge, like --no-ff.  If so,
I don't see an option to preserve the existing behavior, which is the
I-don't-care-just-do-it case.  If the behavior is different, then this
documentation needs to be improved, I think, along with the
documentation earlier in the series.
I don't understand what is your point.

So basically you think these should be the same?

  % git pull --merge --no-merge --rebase --no-rebase
  % git pull
My point is that it's unclear to me what options I need to use to retain
the current behavior (fast-forward if possible, merge otherwise) without
a warning.  Right now, it looks like --merge is equivalent to --no-ff,
which seems silly, since we already have an option for that.

So my request is that you add an option (command-line and configuration)
that maintains the current behavior, or if there's already such an
option, that the documentation be clear enough so that I can figure it
out.  Because right now, it's not.

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help