Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Reject non-ff pulls by default

Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:

Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:
...

quoted

This plan, however, fell off the cliff.

Yeah, I see that $gmane/234488 explains why the second step in the
previous one stopped.  I guess it was in expecting a reroll state,
waiting for that other topic (I do not remember offhand) to
graduate.

I see nothing touching the affected codepaths now, so this time
around we may have a better chance, perhaps?

A chance of what?

A chance not to have the plan "fell off the cliff".

Do you want me to reroll to include the future
backwards-incompatible change warning?

Yes, as I said in the other thread ($gmane/247758), if you do not
have that step yet (I haven't looked at the implementation while
discussing the design in this thread and looking at patches in other
topics) I'd strongly recommend adding one.

Should I include the patch that turns the switch?

Sorry, but you lost me here.  Turns what switch to what value?