Re: What is missing from Git v2.0

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

If we don't standardize this now people will come up with their own
definitions [1] [2] (and many others if you just search GitHub) which
are again likely to differ (slightly), hindering interoperability.

I am afraid that that ship has sailed long time ago, though.

That's most likely true, but it does not get better by postponing this
even more. I still think there's value in introducing this now, Git
still attracts new developers every day. In fact, I currently see a
leap forwarding in the Windows world towards Git, caused by some
rethinking and structural changes in some big companies.

-- 
Sebastian Schuberth