Re: [PATCH v5] Verify index file before we opportunistically update it
From: Duy Nguyen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:00:39
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Yiannis Marangos [off-list ref] wrote:
+/*
+ * This function verifies if index_state has the correct sha1 of an index file.
+ * Don't die if we have any other failure, just return 0.
+ */
+static int verify_index_from(const struct index_state *istate, const char *path)
+{
+ int fd;
+ struct stat st;
+ struct cache_header *hdr;
+ void *mmap_addr;
+ size_t mmap_size;
+
+ if (!istate->initialized)
+ return 0;
+
+ fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+ if (fd < 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (fstat(fd, &st))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* file is too big */
+ if (st.st_size > (size_t)st.st_size)
+ return 0;
+
+ mmap_size = (size_t)st.st_size;
+ if (mmap_size < sizeof(struct cache_header) + 20)
+ return 0;
+
+ mmap_addr = mmap(NULL, mmap_size, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0);
+ close(fd);
+ if (mmap_addr == MAP_FAILED)
+ return 0;
+
+ hdr = mmap_addr;
+ if (verify_hdr(hdr, mmap_size) < 0)
+ goto unmap;verify_hdr() is a bit expensive because you need to digest the whole index file (could big as big as 14MB on webkit). Could we get away without it? I mean, is it enough that we pick the last 20 bytes and compare it with istate->sha1? If we only need 20 bytes, pread() may be better than mmap(). The chance of SHA-1 collision is small enough for us to ignore, I think. And if a client updates the index without updating the trailing sha-1, the index is broken and we don't have to worry about overwriting it.
+ + if (hashcmp(istate->sha1, (unsigned char *)hdr + mmap_size - 20)) + goto unmap; + + munmap(mmap_addr, mmap_size); + return 1; + +unmap: + munmap(mmap_addr, mmap_size); + return 0; +}
-- Duy