On 04/07/2014 08:47 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:33:44AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
quoted
This function is used for other things besides the index, so rename it
accordingly.
Oh, and here it is. I should really have just read ahead before
responding to patch 1.
We can either re-order these first two, or just not worry about it.
Thanks for catching this. Yes, swapping the first two patches solves
the problem and doesn't conflict.
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/