Re: [PATCH 09/10] t4213: test --function-name option

W dniu 2014-03-27 19:50, David A. Dalrymple (and Bhushan G. Lodha) pisze:

+test_expect_success setup '
+	echo "* diff=cpp" > .gitattributes
+
+	>file &&
+	git add file &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m initial &&
+
+	printf "int main(){\n\treturn 0;\n}\n" >> file &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -am second

Wouldn't it be more readable to use "cat \-EOF" or separate files
instead of printf-s with embedded newlines "\n" and tabs "\t"?

-- 
Jakub Narębski