Re: [PATCH v2] git-rebase: Teach rebase "-" shorthand.
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:00:23
John Keeping [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I thought your suggestion was: 'rebase @{-1}' says 'Fast-fowarded HEAD to @{-1}'. It should say 'Fast-forwarded HEAD to 4f407407 (rebase: allow "-" short-hand for the previous branch, 2014-03-19)' instead. Or it could be: 'rebase @{-1}' says 'Fast-fowarded HEAD to @{-1}'. It should say 'Fast-forwarded HEAD to master' instead. In either case, it does not look like such a change is about teaching "-" as a synonym to "@{-1}".My suggestion was specifically: 'rebase -' says 'Fast-forwarded HEAD to -'. It should say 'Fast-forwarded HEAD to master' instead.
OK, it was closer to the latter.
But why is it OK to leave @{-1}, which is just as "hmm, I do not
remember what the previous branch was myself" when the user says
"@{-1}" in the output while it not OK to leave "-" in the output?
I do not think of any sane reason, and that is why I think this
improvement is not part of "teaching rebase that '-' can be used in
place of @{-1}" topic.