Nemina Amarasinghe [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
((!remote_is_branch && origin) || (!remote_is_branch || !origin))
Is it?
The above is the same as (!remote_is_branch || !origin). What you wrote
before is the same as (!remote_is_branch).
Maybe you should try copy&paste from the expressions you are trying to
combine to make sure that what you start with makes sense.
OMG.. Really sorry for that... that was a silly mistake.
This is the one..
((!remote_is_branch && origin) || (!remote_is_branch && !origin))
That is, indeed, perfectly equivalent to (!remote_is_branch). If you
write
(!remote_is_branch && (origin || !origin))
then you will have people (and possibly also the compiler) loudly
wondering about what you are trying to say here. The suspicion would be
that either this is a result of a typo or is supposed to be an
annoyingly obtuse replacement for a
/* TODO: treat origin and !origin differently */
kind of comment.
--
David Kastrup