Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 6/6] merge hook tests: use 'test_must_fail' instead of '!'

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:00:13

Benoit Pierre [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Benoit Pierre <redacted>
---
 t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh b/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh
index 604c06e..1be6cec 100755
--- a/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh
+++ b/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ test_expect_success 'with failing hook' '
 	head=`git rev-parse HEAD` &&
 	echo "more" >> file &&
 	git add file &&
-	! GIT_EDITOR="\"\$FAKE_EDITOR\"" git commit -c $head
+	test_must_fail env GIT_EDITOR="\"\$FAKE_EDITOR\"" git commit -c $head
Thanks. It is good that you avoided the common pitfall of attempting

	GIT_EDITOR=... test_must_fail git commit -c $head    ;# WRONG

but do we assume everybody has "env"?

To be portable, we can do this instead.

	(
		GIT_EDITOR=... &&
        	export GIT_EDITOR &&
                test_must_fail git commit -c $head
	)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help