Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2] cache_tree_find(): remove redundant checks

flat view

From: David Kastrup <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:00:10

Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] writes:
The beginning of the loop ensures that slash can never be NULL.  So
don't keep checking whether it is NULL later in the loop.

Furthermore, there is no need for an early

    return it;

from the loop if slash points at the end of the string, because that
is exactly what will happen when the while condition fails at the
start of the next iteration.
Hm.  Another suggestion.  You have

		const char *slash = strchr(path, '/');
 		if (!slash)
 			slash = path + strlen(path);
[...]
		sub = find_subtree(it, path, slash - path, 0);
[...]
		path = slash;
		while (*path == '/')
			path++;
	}

At the price of introducing another variable, this could be

		const char *slash = strchr(path, '/');
 		size_t len = slash ? slash - path : strlen(path);
[...]
		sub = find_subtree(it, path, len, 0);
[...]
                if (!slash)
			break;
		for (path = slash; *path == '/';)
			path++;
	}

This introduces another variable and another condition.  The advantage
is that "slash" indeed points at a slash or is NULL, so the variable
names correspond better to what happens.  Alternatively, it might make
sense to rename "slash" into "end" or "endpart" or whatever.  Since
I can't think of a pretty name, I lean towards preferring the latter
version as it reads nicer.  I prefer code to read like children's books
rather than mystery novels.

-- 
David Kastrup
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help