Re: [PATCH] GSoC2014 Microproject rewrite finish_bulk_checkin()
From: Faiz Kothari <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:00:05
Hi, Thanks for the remarks. I'll stick to this micro project and follow the guidelines. Yes, the strbuf API is perfectly OK. I was not getting to work it properly, so I used malloc() / free() instead. My bad. I'll resubmit the patch. Thanks. On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] wrote:
On 02/27/2014 08:02 PM, Faiz Kothari wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Faiz Kothari <redacted> --- bulk-checkin.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/bulk-checkin.c b/bulk-checkin.c index 118c625..feeff9f 100644 --- a/bulk-checkin.c +++ b/bulk-checkin.c@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static struct bulk_checkin_state { static void finish_bulk_checkin(struct bulk_checkin_state *state) { unsigned char sha1[20]; - char packname[PATH_MAX]; + struct strbuf packname; int i; if (!state->f)@@ -42,9 +42,11 @@ static void finish_bulk_checkin(struct bulk_checkin_state *state) state->offset); close(fd); } - - sprintf(packname, "%s/pack/pack-", get_object_directory()); - finish_tmp_packfile(packname, state->pack_tmp_name, + + packname.len = packname.alloc = 64 + strlen(get_object_directory()); + packname.buf = (char *)malloc(packname.len * sizeof(char)); + sprintf(packname.buf, "%s/pack/pack-", get_object_directory()); + finish_tmp_packfile(packname.buf, state->pack_tmp_name, state->written, state->nr_written, &state->pack_idx_opts, sha1); for (i = 0; i < state->nr_written; i++)@@ -53,7 +55,7 @@ static void finish_bulk_checkin(struct bulk_checkin_state *state) clear_exit: free(state->written); memset(state, 0, sizeof(*state)); - + free(packname.buf); /* Make objects we just wrote available to ourselves */ reprepare_packed_git(); } -- 1.7.9.5quoted
Rewrite bulk-checkin.c:finish_bulk_checkin() to use a strbuf for handling packname, and explain why this is useful. Also check if the first argument of pack-write.c:finish_tmp_packfile() can be made const.Adding 64 to strlen(get_object_directory()) to accomodate sha1_to_hex(sha1) and itself. Using the APIs for strbuf is giving me test failures(12/15) during t1050-large.sh So, I used the malloc() and free() instead.This is not OK. I promise you, the strbuf API works correctly if it is used correctly. (And if it really *were* broken, you should fix the problem or at least diagnose and document it rather than working around it.)quoted
Instead of having packname on stack and cause stackoverflow because of MAX_PATH ~ 4KB, have it on heap. Can have first parameter to pack-write.c:finish_tmp_packfile() as const because packname is not required to be modified. I apologise for my two earlier patches not being in proper format. I have finally got it working properly. Will make sure, it does not happen again.Almost. This last set of comments should be moved to directly after the "---" line. But: please rather stick to *one* microproject and get it perfect, and leave the others to other students. Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/