Re: [PATCH 3/3] fetch --prune: Repair branchname DF conflicts
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:59:29
Tom Miller [off-list ref] writes:
The commit below should be the same patch he tested. The test was added by him, and I made it part of this commit. Did I do this wrong?
No, no, no. All my questions were true questions, not complaints veiled as rhetorical questions. Thanks for many pointers for clarification.
quoted
quoted
quoted
---builtin/fetch.c | 10 +++++----- t/t5510-fetch.sh | 14 ++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c index e50b697..845c687 100644 --- a/builtin/fetch.c +++ b/builtin/fetch.c@@ -868,11 +868,6 @@ static int do_fetch(struct transport *transport, if (tags == TAGS_DEFAULT && autotags) transport_set_option(transport, TRANS_OPT_FOLLOWTAGS, "1"); - if (fetch_refs(transport, ref_map)) { - free_refs(ref_map); - retcode = 1; - goto cleanup; - } if (prune) { /* * We only prune based on refspecs specified@@ -888,6 +883,11 @@ static int do_fetch(struct transport *transport, transport->url); } } + if (fetch_refs(transport, ref_map)) { + free_refs(ref_map); + retcode = 1; + goto cleanup; + } free_refs(ref_map); /* if neither --no-tags nor --tags was specified, do automated tagdiff --git a/t/t5510-fetch.sh b/t/t5510-fetch.sh index 5d4581d..a981125 100755 --- a/t/t5510-fetch.sh +++ b/t/t5510-fetch.sh@@ -614,4 +614,18 @@ test_expect_success 'all boundary commits are excluded' ' test_bundle_object_count .git/objects/pack/pack-${pack##pack }.pack 3 ' +test_expect_success 'branchname D/F conflict resolved by --prune' ' + git branch dir/file && + git clone . prune-df-conflict && + git branch -D dir/file && + git branch dir && + ( + cd prune-df-conflict && + git fetch --prune && + git rev-parse origin/dir >../actual + ) && + git rev-parse dir >expect && + test_cmp expect actual +' + test_done