Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Minor grammatical fixes in "git log" man page

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:59:13

Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
Jason St. John wrote:
quoted
git-log.txt: grammatical fixes under --log-size option
Thanks.

[...]
quoted
--- a/Documentation/git-log.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-log.txt
@@ -56,10 +56,10 @@ Note that this affects all diff-based output types, e.g. those
 produced by --stat etc.

 --log-size::
-	Before the log message print out its size in bytes. Intended
+	Before the log message, print out its size in bytes. Intended
Either reads well at least for me.
quoted
 	mainly for porcelain tools consumption. If Git is unable to
-	produce a valid value size is set to zero.
-	Note that only message is considered, if also a diff is shown
+	produce a valid value size, this is set to zero.
+	Note that only message is considered. Also, if a diff is shown,
 	its size is not included.
I have no idea what this option does, before or after the change.
The original is probably more accurate, if harder to read.  The
byte-size of the message part of log output is reported, so that
tools like QGit can slurp that many bytes and then treat the
remainder as a patch (if -p, --stat, etc. were given).
Perhaps some of the above could make it into a clearer description?
E.g.,

	--log-size::
		Include a line "log size <number>" in the output for each
		commit, where <number> is the length of that commit's
		message in bytes.  Intended to speed up tools that
		read log messages from 'git log' output by allowing them
		to allocate space in advance.
Yeah, that reads better. We do not have to single out "if also a
diff is shown", as there are other kinds of output that can follow
the message proper, and they are not counted.
The commit introducing --log-size also says:

	    In case it is not possible to know the size upfront
	    size value is set to zero.

Is this still true?  When is it not possible to know the size up
front?
I have no idea ;-)  Perhaps Marco can enlighten us?
The implementation of --log-size is

	if (opt->show_log_size) {
		printf("log size %i\n", (int)msgbuf.len);
		graph_show_oneline(opt->graph);
	}

What happens if the commit message is long enough to overflow a 32-bit
integer?  Is that impossible for other reasons?  If it is possible,
(not about this patch) should this be using a 64-bit integer to print
instead?
A nice low-hanging fruit ;-)

Thanks
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help