Re: My patches

Junio C Hamano wrote:

Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Such a review comment and the discussion that follows it after a
patch is posted is an essential part of the collaborative
development process in this community and it has helped the quality
of our end product. We unfortunately saw time and again that the
process rarely works when the discussion involves your patches.

No, you did not. What you saw was a person that unlike a trained dog, argued
against you. And apparently your definition of a good discussion is one in
which the other person just does what you say, and doesn't argue back.

That is so untrue that it is not even funny.

It is true, and there's penty of evidence that proves it.

Every single time that you get mad at me, it's because I disagree with you.

Contributors often make sensible counter-arguments and/or explain
the rationale better than they did in their original messages, and
then receive a "Thanks for a dose of sanity" (or an equivalent
phrased in different ways).

Yes, when there's an agreement, so you are basically proving what I said. I
disagree with you, you disagree with me, and that means I'm the problem.

In any healthy collaborative project that simply means there was a
disagreement, and that's that.

-- 
Felipe Contreras