Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] test: use unambigous leading path (/foo) for mingw
From: Jiang Xin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:59:00
2013/10/11 Sebastian Schuberth [off-list ref]:
quoted
In test cases for relative_path, path with one leading character (such as /a, /x) may be recogonized as "a:/" or "x:/" if there is such DOS drive on MINGW platform. Use an umambigous leading path "/foo" instead. Also change two leading slashes (//) to three leading slashes (///), otherwize it will be recognized as UNC name on MINGW platform.Note that the path mangling comes from MSYS [1], not MinGW, so you should place "MINGW" with "MSYS" in several places. As a side-note, the official spelling is "MinGW", not "MINGW".
I will make a reroll. s/MINGW/MSYS/i
quoted
-relative_path /a/b/c/ /a/b/ c/quoted
+relative_path /foo/a/b/c/ /foo/a/b/ c/Wouldn't it have been more straight-forward to just replace "a" with "foo", "b" with "bar" and "c" with "baz" (or whatever)? So that the first line would say relative_path /foo/bar/baz/ /foo/bar/ baz/
These test cases have been used in some commit logs, such as commit: v1.8.3-rc2-13-gad66df2. And for me (a non-English speaker) a,b,c,x,y,z are more readable than bar, baz, qux, ... -- Jiang Xin