Re: [PATCH 3/3] for-each-ref: introduce %(upstream:track[short])
flat view
From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:58:54
Am 9/27/2013 14:10, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ else if (!strcmp(formatp, "track") && + !prefixcmp(name, "upstream")) { + char buf[40]; + + if (!upstream_present) + continue; + stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs); + if (!num_ours && !num_theirs) + v->s = ""; + else if (!num_ours) { + sprintf(buf, "[behind %d]", num_theirs); + v->s = xstrdup(buf); + } else if (!num_theirs) { + sprintf(buf, "[ahead %d]", num_ours); + v->s = xstrdup(buf); + } else { + sprintf(buf, "[ahead %d, behind %d]", + num_ours, num_theirs); + v->s = xstrdup(buf); + }
These strdupped strings are leaked, right?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ continue; + } else if (!strcmp(formatp, "trackshort") && + !prefixcmp(name, "upstream")) { + if (!upstream_present) + continue; + stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs); + if (!num_ours && !num_theirs) + v->s = "="; + else if (!num_ours) + v->s = "<"; + else if (!num_theirs) + v->s = ">"; + else + v->s = "<>"; + continue; + } else die("unknown %.*s format %s", (int)(formatp - name), name, formatp); }
-- Hannes