Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reject non-ff pulls by default
From: John Keeping <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:58:42
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:52:31PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:47:45AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
You are in favor of an _option_ to allow people to forbid a pull in a non-ff situation, and I think other people are also in agreement. So perhaps: - drop jc/pull-training-wheel and revert its merge from 'next'; - update Felipe's series with a bit of tweak to make it less impactful by demoting error into warning and advice. would be a good way forward?I think that would address the concern I raised, because it does not create a roadblock to new users accomplishing their task. They can ignore the warning, or choose "merge" as the default to shut up the warning (and it is easy to choose that if you are confused, because it is what git is doing by default alongside the warning).
I think we need to make sure that we give instructions for how to go
back if the default hasn't done what you wanted. Something like this:
Your pull did not fast-forward, so Git has merged '$upstream' into
your branch, which may not be correct for your project. If you
would rather rebase your changes, run
git rebase
See "pull.mode" in git-config(1) to suppress this message in the
future.
?