Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2013, #01; Tue, 3)

Jens Lehmann [off-list ref] writes:

Am 04.09.2013 21:19, schrieb Junio C Hamano:

quoted

Matthieu Moy [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

* mm/status-without-comment-char (2013-08-29) 5 commits
 - status: introduce status.displayCommentChar to disable display of #
 - SQUASH: do not fprintf() random strings
 - get rid of "git submodule summary --for-status"
 - wt-status: use argv_array API
 - builtin/stripspace.c: fix broken indentation

 Allow "git status" to omit the prefix to make its output a comment
 in a commit log editor, which is not necessary for human
 consumption.

I'm waiting for the situation of "git submodule --for-status" to be
settled to send a reroll. Don't merge this for now, and let
bc/submodule-status-ignored converge.

Thanks.  I had an impression that bc/submodule-status-ignored was
still being discussed.  Has what I have in 'pu' settled?

Almost (see my other mail concerning bc/submodule-status-ignored).
If the removal of the --for-status option is reverted from patch #3
here (which I outlined in $gmane/233764) this series can be merged
without really depending on bc/submodule-status-ignored (even though
the temporarily unused --for-status option may look a bit strange
until the latter is merged).

I'll also need to reword the commit messages.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/