Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] get rid of "git submodule summary --for-status"
From: Jens Lehmann <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:58:35
Am 30.08.2013 21:51, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
Am 30.08.2013 21:40, schrieb Jens Lehmann:quoted
Am 29.08.2013 23:23, schrieb Matthieu Moy:quoted
Jens Lehmann [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Am 29.08.2013 15:05, schrieb Matthieu Moy:quoted
The --for-status option was an undocumented option used only by wt-status.c, which inserted a header and commented out the output. We can achieve the same result within wt-status.c, without polluting the submodule command-line options. This will make it easier to disable the comments from wt-status.c later.Cool, thanks for implementing this! But unfortunately this change collides with bc/submodule-status-ignored (I added Brian to the CC) which is currently on its way to next.Thanks for pointing that out. The patch looks buggy:Ok, I'll takSorry, I accidentally hit "Send" ... :-( Ok, I'll take a look and will comment on that soon.quoted
quoted
--- a/git-submodule.sh +++ b/git-submodule.sh@@ -1036,6 +1036,13 @@ cmd_summary() { do # Always show modules deleted or type-changed (blob<->module) test $status = D -o $status = T && echo "$sm_path" && continue + # Respect the ignore setting for --for-status. + if test -n $for_status + then + name=$(module_name "$sm_path") + ignore_config=$(get_submodule_config "$name" ignore none) + test $status != A -a $ignore_config = all && continue + fiBecause of the missing quotes around $for_status, it seems the test is unconditionnaly true: $ test -n t ; echo $? 0 $ test -n ; echo $? 0
Right you are, I did not notice the missing "" in my review. Looks like we also should add one or more tests making sure that submodule summary and status never honor the ignore settings.