Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:
Matthieu Moy wrote:
quoted
--work alone sounds weird. At least to me, it does not immediately imply
"working tree". It is tempting to call the option --work-tree, but git
already has a global option with that name (git --work-tree=foo bar).
Yes, --work sounds weird, but so does --cherry. I thought about --wt, but I
felt --work was more understandable, and --work-tree doesn't really give much
more value,
I think it does: I understand --work as "the verb to work", so
"git reset --work" sounds like "tell 'git reset' to work", while
"git reset --work-tree" sounds like "tell git to reset the work tree".
except more characters to type =/
Then, we can have --work-tree and a short version -w.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/