Jens Lehmann [off-list ref] writes:
But I'm not terribly happy about having the --for-status option in the
submodule script in the first place, as I believe it should rather be
handled by wt-status.c itself (reading the output of submodule summary
using the start_command()/finish_command() combo instead of the simple
run_command() currently used and prepending the comment char by using
status_printf() & friends for each line).
I went the --for-status way because it's easier to do this in shell than
in C. But I'm close to be convinced that implementing this on the
wt-status.c side is better. I'll try a re-roll doing this when I get
time.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/