Re: [PATCH 05/11] Fix some typos and improve wording
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:58:32
Thomas Ackermann [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <redacted> --- Documentation/user-manual.txt | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt index 6241a43..465d9cb 100644 --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ of development leading to that point. The best way to see how this works is using the linkgit:gitk[1] command; running gitk now on a Git repository and looking for merge -commits will help understand how the Git organizes history. +commits will help understand how Git organizes history. In the following, we say that commit X is "reachable" from commit Y if commit X is an ancestor of commit Y. Equivalently, you could say@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ e05db0fd4f31dde7005f075a84f96b360d05984b ------------------------------------------------- Or you could recall that the `...` operator selects all commits -contained reachable from either one reference or the other but not +reachable from either one reference or the other but not both; so -------------------------------------------------@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ You could just visually inspect the commits since e05db0fd: $ gitk e05db0fd.. ------------------------------------------------- -Or you can use linkgit:git-name-rev[1], which will give the commit a +or you can use linkgit:git-name-rev[1], which will give the commit a
I think I agree with Jonathan that this reads better with "Or", not "or". Other than that looks good to me. Thanks.