Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?
From: David Jeske <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:58:24
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Don't we already do that?
Warning: you are leaving N commits behind, not connected to
any of your branches:
... list of commits to be lost ...This only shows on checkout... not reset, not submodule-update, nor any other ways you can clobber a detached head.