Re: Flatten history
From: Hilco Wijbenga <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:58:16
On 29 July 2013 20:59, Bryan Turner [off-list ref] wrote:
On 30 July 2013 13:50, Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Hilco Wijbenga [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi all, I have a (public) "feature" branch that has been kept up-to-date with "master" by regularly merging master back into it. I would now like to get all the changes from feature but not any of the commits. Basically, I want to replay all of feature's commits without creating those commits. I thought something like git cherry-pick -n abcd^..feature should do the trick (while on master, where abcd is the SHA-1 of the commit where feature was created) but I get conflicts. First, why the conflicts? I have done all the merges so cherry-pick should simply be able to replay them? Second, what is the correct way of doing this?Perhaps % git cherry-pick -n --no-merges --right-only --topo-order --cherry-pick abcd^..feature -- Felipe ContrerasWouldn't git merge --squash do what you're looking for? It seems like the only way to not get conflicts trying to cherry pick is if you never had any conflicts while you were merging master into your feature branch. "Evil" merges, where you actually have to change code, even if it's just to resolve conflicts, don't tend to replay correctly. It seems like this should do it: % git checkout master Switched to branch 'master' % git merge --squash feature Squash commit -- not updating HEAD Automatic merge went well; stopped before committing as requested % git commit git merge --squash will just apply the changes without creating a commit. You can then make any final changes you want to and write your commit message for the feature.
Ah, yes "git merge --squash feature" seems to do exactly what I was looking for. Funny, I thought I did something with rev-list last time but this --squash is much simpler. :-) Thank you!