Re: [PATCH 2/5] t4211: demonstrate empty -L range crash

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

Eric Sunshine [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

SZEDER Gábor [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

You could avoid the 'cat' here and patch in 4/5 by doing $(wc -l <b.c).

Correct.

Thanks, I like that better.

Unfortunately, what actually got queued on 'next', after applying this
fix-up and re-ordering the patch series, is slightly bogus.

The lesson is that one should not rebase while waiting for a flight
in a hurry X-<.

Will queue the following on top.

Thanks, that looks fine.