Re: [PATCH/RFC] blame: accept multiple -L ranges

Thomas Rast [off-list ref] writes:

I'll just leave it at that and let you decide what to do (presumably go
ahead as you already outlined).  I've never actually ever used multiple
-L in the same log/blame invocation, anyway.

Nobody has ;-).

It is just between my "I often wished while looking at 'less foo.c'
I wanted to give more than on -L to cover two ranges I see in the
file" and your "I do not know if the user can give the first -L to
cover the first range and the second -L to cover the second range".
I do not think neither of us successfully gave more than one -L and
got any useful result.