Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Johannes Sixt wrote:
quoted
Sorry, IMO, this goes into a totally wrong direction, in particular, I
think that this is going to close to door to make --lockref the default
some day in a way that helps everyone.
Would a '*' that acts like --lockref on a per ref basis address your
concerns?
(Aside: '*' is not a great character for that. * is already taken in
refspec syntax. There's no clash but the two uses would be confusing.
*:
*:*
Some other single-character prefix could work, such as '.' or '~'.)