Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: How to still kill git fetch with too many refs

From: Brandon Casey <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:58

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:41:51AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
quoted
I replicated your test setup, and the problem is that we have many
common objects on both sides during the ref negotiation. So we end up in
rev_list_push for each one, which has the same O(n^2) behavior.
Switching it to just sort at the end is not trivial; we first insert all
of the objects, but then we actually walk the parents, pushing onto the
list as we go. So I think we'd want a better data structure (like a
priority queue).
Like the patch below,
<snip>

Looks obviously correct to me since I've got essentially the same
patch sitting in my local repo. :b

I've got the patch coming that fixes the same problem on the push side
of things and provides the same order of magnitude improvement.

-Brandon
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help