Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: How to still kill git fetch with too many refs

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:57:58

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:41:51AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
quoted
I replicated your test setup, and the problem is that we have many
common objects on both sides during the ref negotiation. So we end up in
rev_list_push for each one, which has the same O(n^2) behavior.
Switching it to just sort at the end is not trivial; we first insert all
of the objects, but then we actually walk the parents, pushing onto the
list as we go. So I think we'd want a better data structure (like a
priority queue).
Like the patch below, which is built on top of next (which has Junio's
prio_queue implementation), and has both the priority queue fix for
rev_list_push and the mark_complete sort-at-the-end fix.
Wow, I saw "160 lines" in my MUA which scared me a bit until I
opened it to realize 40% is discussion and most of the remaining
lines are context around single liners.

It just looks too easy/simple, but the result looks correct, at
least from a cursory read.

Good job ;-)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help